Ending Discrimination in Schools
Sunday, July 24th, 2011An intriguing ruling by the U.S. Top court could re-open discussion about the brainwashing that occurs in all-too-many public school classrooms these days.
The High Court now issued a thumbs-down to so-called “diversity” plans in 2 large school districts which use race as a factor in assigning students. Based on a related Press report, the ruling could affect not just schools in Seattle and Louisville, but tend to impact like-minded plans in countless school systems around the country.
Chief Justice John Roberts said the school districts involved “failed to exhibit they considered methods other than explicit racial classifications to achieve their stated goals.” Roberts and also the remaining Court majority think that the proposals in Seattle and Louisville conflicted with Constitutional guarantees for equal protection. Granted, the Court was split 5-4, but a choice is a decision, and something can only hope this decision deals a fatal blow to ill-conceived race-based school policies.
Obviously, liberals happen to be offering a knee-jerk assessment from the decision. Justice Stephen Breyer in his dissent said, “To invalidate the plans under review would be to threaten the commitment of Brown (v. Board of Education).”
But wasn’t the dream of civil rights leader Martin Luther King to establish a society when people weren’t judged on race, but on the content of their character? As the Bush Administration argued, racial diversity can be a noble goal, but it should simply be achieved by race-neutral means.
Lawyer Teddy Gordon argued the Louisville district’s plan was a form of discrimination. In the AP report, he’s quoted as saying,” Clearly, we want better race-neutral alternatives. Instead of spending zillions of dollars round the country to place a black child next to a white child, let’s reduce class size. All the schools are equal. We will no longer believe that an African-American majority within a school is unacceptable.”
Let’s bear in mind here that it was parents themselves who have been upset with the programs in Seattle and Louisville, and it was the mother and father who sued. Now, it might stand to reason why parents have been in the very best position to determine what kind of educational plan is perfect for their own children. They’re far more concerned about whether Johnny can read than who Johnny sits alongside in class.
No child should have his or her educational opportunities limited due to race. America is supposed to be the land of freedom–not a place where arcane bureaucratic rules and outdated theories of education reign supreme. Parents should have the greatest flexibility in determining where their children visit school–particularly since it’s the parents’ tax dollars which are supporting the colleges. It’s simply wrong to hang an indication on a schoolhouse door saying only a number of blacks or whites are allowed in.